Communication Plan
Join Kudzu Jungle to get access to our videos, coming in June.
Our site has been constructed during the month of May, and we are beta testing it. June will be spent creating videos and regular content creation begins as the cases progress.
PHASE 1: START UP - Open to all Guests
All sign ups will be considered beta testers until we close this phase.
You’ll be able to keep up with our own training, an introvert and extrovert with different personalities, learning how to create videos, how to live stream, and how to communicate with others while looking into a camera and trying to act professional.
We’ll also talk about our camping lifestyle, and learning how to film and present topics…speaking, b-roll, editing, etc. The projects we work on at the guest level will still be ongoing.
PHASE 2: CASE MANAGEMENT - Open to Subscribers
Once we get better at working at the cameras, streaming software, and communication skills, we’ll provide videos about the cases we are involved in, goals, struggles, ah ha moments, and the “What have we gotten ourselves into?” moments. There are a lot of challenges we have to face.
Our first Round Table discussion will begin with Doc. 47 (Case No. 3:25-cv-00516). This is a very critical order entered by the magistrate judge. The consequences of this order sparks a debate waiting to happen. To understand what is at stake, please click the link below.
PHASE 3: LITIGATION DIARY - Open to Pro Se Journey Subscribers
Pro Se Journey is entertainment content — you’re looking over our shoulder. We are documenting our journey and any questions we are asked that sound in legal advice will not be answered.
Accused of practicing law without a license is the inspiration for our litigation diary idea. We will show our step-by-step litigation management system. We don’t have lawyers ghostwriting. We are not lawyers. We live in an information world just like lawyers do. The difference is, we are self-represented. It started like this:
We found ourselves in an unfamiliar situation.
In everything we do, we ask YHWH for wisdom. We get wisdom. That doesn’t mean we will succeed because of our wisdom, since we live in a fallen world. However, we do the best we can with what we have to work with and we try not to grow weary in doing good. We believe the battle for patients first, over profits is a very worthy battle.
We will gladly show the world how we learn, how we come up with arguments, and how we write our pleadings, motions, replies and other documents, in the format of a documentary. We have come a long way since our over pleaded 400+ pages of the original complaint was filed. Wow, are we glad we got a mulligan on that one! Managing that novel would have been a nightmare. The more condensed complaint was filed in the state court, but was removed by the corporate defendants, to the District Court.
The Accusations & Our Response
Defendant first raises the accusation:
Case # 3:24-cv-00382 (E.D. Tennessee) Docket # 61
TENNOVA DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
We respond:
Case # 3:24-cv-00382 (E.D. Tennessee) Docket # 62
PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. 61)
Defendants Uses Footnote Accusation:
Case # 3:24-cv-00382 (E.D. Tennessee)
Doc. 66, footnote 2:
Defendant is aware that Mr. and Mrs. Crawford filed a Reply to Tennova Defendants’ Response in Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration. [Doc. 62]. Defendant will not file a sur-reply, pursuant to local rules. However, Defendant contends that Plaintiffs’ request for reinstatement of claims is baseless, the rebuttal of the assertions of unauthorized practice of law is unsupported,
and the accompanying affidavit (Doc. 62-1) as well as emails received from Mrs. Crawford since the filing of Doc. 62 further substantiate these UPL assertions.
We Respond to the Footnote:
Case # 3:24-cv-00382 (E.D. Tennessee)
Doc. 68, PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 65)